<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VMWare revenue up 101% in 2006</title>
	<link>http://www.virtualizationdaily.com/archives/110_vmware-revenue-up-101-in-2006.html</link>
	<description>Watching virtualization and virtual appliances with a focus on applications in small business and the Mac</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 05:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Kurt</title>
		<link>http://www.virtualizationdaily.com/archives/110_vmware-revenue-up-101-in-2006.html#comment-1181</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 22:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.virtualizationdaily.com/archives/110_vmware-revenue-up-101-in-2006.html#comment-1181</guid>
					<description>VMWare was a privately held company before they were acquired by EMC.  I purchased some EMC stock immediately after (solely due to the fact of being a faithful VMWare user and believing in the technology!).  Anyhow, I couldn't agree more - there stock *is* flat; And spinning the company as an independent company (I'm sure little has changed since the acquisition anyhow!) would be a very smart move for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VMWare was a privately held company before they were acquired by EMC.  I purchased some EMC stock immediately after (solely due to the fact of being a faithful VMWare user and believing in the technology!).  Anyhow, I couldn&#8217;t agree more - there stock *is* flat; And spinning the company as an independent company (I&#8217;m sure little has changed since the acquisition anyhow!) would be a very smart move for them.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
