Comments on: Please NO, not Virtualization 2.0 http://www.virtualizationdaily.com/archives/34_please-no-not-virtualization-20.html Watching virtualization and virtual appliances with a focus on applications in small business and the Mac Wed, 07 Jan 2009 13:39:54 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0 by: Sean Tierney http://www.virtualizationdaily.com/archives/34_please-no-not-virtualization-20.html#comment-11 Thu, 19 Oct 2006 05:41:55 +0000 http://www.virtualizationdaily.com/archives/34_please-no-not-virtualization-20.html#comment-11 yea the part where they asked the panelists to rate their own 2.0-ness and people were saying "I'm about at Office 1.87" was just too much. looks like Collaboration 2.0 is the next thing. weeeeeee! -> http://www.collaborationloop.com/blogs/collaboration-2-dot-0-2.htm sean yea the part where they asked the panelists to rate their own 2.0-ness and people were saying “I’m about at Office 1.87″ was just too much.

looks like Collaboration 2.0 is the next thing. weeeeeee! -> http://www.collaborationloop.com/blogs/collaboration-2-dot-0-2.htm

sean

]]> by: Tarry Singh http://www.virtualizationdaily.com/archives/34_please-no-not-virtualization-20.html#comment-10 Tue, 17 Oct 2006 23:07:48 +0000 http://www.virtualizationdaily.com/archives/34_please-no-not-virtualization-20.html#comment-10 Kimbro, Really so true. My ass begins to twitch (as Kevin Kline would say)when they talk about 2.0... Kimbro,

Really so true. My ass begins to twitch (as Kevin Kline would say)when they talk about 2.0…

]]>